Updated 2026-07-22 Β· 8 decks Β· S17 Β· DAS Β· methodology
Hard 10 vs dealer Ace: the verdict
The verdict is hit. Against a dealer Ace, drawing another card carries the best expectation for hard 10.
The numbers
| Action | Win | Push | Lose | EV per $1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hit | 47.2% | 13.6% | 39.1% | +0.081 |
| Double | 44.3% | 10.8% | 45.0% | β0.014 |
| Stand | 16.7% | 0.0% | 83.3% | β0.667 |
Why hit is correct
Standing here wins only when the dealer busts, and a dealer showing Ace busts just 16.7% of the time β the other 83.3% they make a hand and your total loses on its own. Hitting risks going over, but the math nets out ahead: 47.2% wins versus 16.7% for standing, and a better expected value overall.
For context, a dealer Ace finishes on 17β20 about 75.6% of the time, on 21 7.8%, and busts 16.7%. Those dealer outcomes are the same no matter what you hold β the whole game is choosing the action whose distribution fits them best.
What the mistake costs
Choosing double instead of hit costs about $239 per 100 such hands at $25 a hand (β0.095 EV per dollar). The genuinely expensive error here is stand: β0.748 per dollar, or roughly $1871 per 100 hands at the same stakes.
Does the rule set change it?
No β hit holds across every common configuration: Vegas Strip, Atlantic City with late surrender, H17 games and European no-hole-card tables all agree here.
π Blackjack Welcome Bonus β 500% + 70 FS18+ Β· New players Β· First deposit Β· T&C apply Β· Play responsiblyRelated spots
10 against other dealer cards:
Other key hands vs a dealer Ace: